So why the confusion? Education or position don't seem to have anything to do with this erroneous perception. We often even see senators expressing this confusion. Republicans in particular seem to equate freedom with 'getting the government out of our way', but only in the economic sense. They want less regulation, less legal oversight, less government influence on economic policy in general. At the same time, these same people advocate the government becoming closely involved with people's private lives. They advocate strict government control over what we can read, see in movies or tv, and whom someone chooses to marry. They often couch their arguments on 'protection of children' or some other equally specious argument as justification for government intervention. (As if freedoms described in our legal system are predicated on palatability to children).
Although economic and political systems are distinct, they obviously have a great deal of influence on each other. And yes, democracies tend to be more free in the capitalist/economic sense. As we are seeing, however, systems can evolve where one threatens the other. In his book Supercapitalism, Robert Reich provides a cogent account of how and why this is happening today, not just in America, but around the world. I recommend this book highly. It doesn't just identify the problems, but describes a plan for promoting rich and vibrant capitalism along with a rich and vibrant democracy.
In a nutshell, Reich dispels the notion that corporations have the rights of citizens. He argues we must stop treating corporations as if they were individual people. Stop taxing corporations and only tax the owners (shareholders). Stop expecting corporations to be patriotic or socially responsible. This isn't what corporations are designed to do. Don't hold corporations responsible for criminal conduct, only people within them.
Only people can be citizens and have the rights of citizen (as well as the responsibilities). Only citizens should be allowed to participate in democratic governmental decision making.
2 comments:
Excellent post. I absolutely agree with the idea that corporations should not have the same rights as individual citizens. Even worse, it seems we tend to give some corporations more rights than individuals, which I find morally and economically and rationally flawed.
Also, it seems a lot of people in the United States are confured that the country is the ideal Democracy, when, in fact, the USA is actually a federal republic with democratic tendencies. We, the People in the USA, choose representatives in (relatively) free elections, who are then free to use their own discretion to vote on matters of varying interest to their constituencies; we do not have a true Democracy. But we are pretty staunch supporters of the Capitalist aspect.
Yes, as I mentioned, there are many types and many levels of democratic government. I would actually like to see more of a parlimentary system here. When you have only two parties with any real chance of holding office, you get an oligarchy like we've had for the past 8 years. Believe me, I don't think it would be healthy if the democrats had complete control either (as the repubs have had). Anyway, I highly recommend Reich's book. I hope Obama appoints him to something meaningful. He's a brilliant guy.
Post a Comment